From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: several quick questions Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:39:34 -0800 Message-ID: <7vu0b1pntl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <43F20532.5000609@iaglans.de> <87k6bxvmj6.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <87fymlvgzv.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <87d5hpvc8p.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 14 23:39:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F98ph-0003Yt-3V for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:39:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422824AbWBNWjh (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:39:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422849AbWBNWjh (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:39:37 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:41119 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422824AbWBNWjg (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:39:36 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060214223758.ITSD20441.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:37:58 -0500 To: Carl Worth In-Reply-To: <87d5hpvc8p.wl%cworth@cworth.org> (Carl Worth's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:53:10 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Carl Worth writes: > You've pointed out that branches are free in terms of what git has to > do. I'm saying that they're not free for the user who bears the cost > of inventing a name. And in the case of any commit-while-seeking, it's > at the time of the commit itself that the user has enough information > to invent a useful name, not prior to seeking, (when the user is still > trying to figure things out). I think this is a very valid point and I am happy to accept a workable proposal (does not have to be a working patch, but a general semantics that covers most of if not all the corner cases).