From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-core-arch: Missing dependency Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:51:38 -0800 Message-ID: <7vu0ejm30l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200511111446.jABEk6QM023362@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> <7vy83vnl7r.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <4374E0EF.2020801@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wright X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 11 19:53:26 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eae0E-0001hD-VT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:51:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751033AbVKKSvl (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751032AbVKKSvl (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:41 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:54718 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbVKKSvk (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:40 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051111185112.OGQG4527.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:12 -0500 To: Andreas Ericsson In-Reply-To: <4374E0EF.2020801@op5.se> (Andreas Ericsson's message of "Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:20:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andreas Ericsson writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Horst von Brand writes: >> >>>The command git-archimport makes use of tla, but the relevant package(s) are >>>not on the requirements >> Thanks. Should the fix be like this? >> Group: Development/Tools >> -Requires: git-core = %{version}-%{release} >> +Requires: git-core = %{version}-%{release}, tla > > Just to be anal; > Requires doesn't usually include the %release,... Obviously both you and Chris (who did the part you are quoting for us) know RPM spec a lot better than I do, and I see two experts contradicting with each other. It could have been just an oversight, or it might have done deliberately --- I cannot judge myself, so I punt here. I'll remove "-%{release}" when I hear Chris says he agrees with you. Thanks both.