From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Sanity check of git-commit patch, was Re: [PATCH] Making CFLAGS compilant with GNU Coding Standards Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:53:50 -0700 Message-ID: <7vu0hzw9sx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1123306575.7588.17.camel@dv.roinet.com> <7vy87c2lrv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050808231036.GA22778@mythryan2.michonline.com> <7vpssnyge0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pavel Roskin , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 09 14:54:12 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2TcC-0000yc-8H for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:53:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932529AbVHIMxw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:53:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932530AbVHIMxw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:53:52 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net ([68.230.241.31]:45269 "EHLO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932529AbVHIMxw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:53:52 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050809125351.VDHR16890.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:53:51 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:17:54 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > I just checked. Three nitpicks: > > - I don't like the GNU way to abbreviate long options too much... True. My bad old habit. > - Multiple -m options was actually a feature of my version of the patch. Ah, OK. > - The "case .. in x) .. ;; esac;" construct is sometimes more confusing > than a simple "if", or even a "[ .. = x ] && ..". Yes sometimes.