From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Possible regression in ref advertisement Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:31:01 -0800 Message-ID: <7vvc9gxn2y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1361811516.3212.14.camel@centaur.cmartin.tk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Carlos =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= Nieto X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 25 19:31:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UA2pn-0000nP-HY for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:31:31 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758825Ab3BYSbH convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:31:07 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:61270 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347Ab3BYSbD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:31:03 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D66B7D8; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:31:03 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=PYjOoof8tCEA qH3AsAOpSkRUe7w=; b=SvjJMSwE2y4gM15hxdwV66jv92z2sepzJ4qKEYNDHrmX yiKbnWw88OvlP5OkFSWKPTK6QTqDz0cghpD6jEJwxNt4+bHiFr0xA+LHwXU+Jfob RizGg6HuFhdcMJ1edFO3z+H23+lH4hi53bC2Y/r2ki4LPY+fghk2C+HGMCC6aQ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=m4onVm S00KCLesxGxbbVguGjMwlJdu0X8g9DzvF8yLGEHq4fDOxRPZX/pl2J+lxfqWbH+N jdWw34E/5ZJAFYyj5ZvY5+GUXZ8Zqqqs9JLJ640T19/qwmDDkxE1MxMeM9X6rSj2 2YC1UJM1+t6BS/6Fm6vqCeSSCzrYx3lc2u5r8= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28567B7D7; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:31:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0869B7D4; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:31:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1361811516.3212.14.camel@centaur.cmartin.tk> ("Carlos =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= Nieto"'s message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:58:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 82328DCC-7F79-11E2-9C1A-F3C82E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Carlos Mart=C3=ADn Nieto writes: > Hi all, > > When testing to see if a different implementation was in shape, I cam= e > across something odd where newer git doesn't advertise one of the ref= s > in the git repo. > > Running `git ls-remote .` or `git-upload-pack` in my git repo, newer = git > versions omit peeling the v1.8.0-rc3 tag. > > The diff between the command above when ran with 1.7.10.4 (from Debia= n) > and current 'master' > > --- old 2013-02-25 17:31:29.583526606 +0100 > +++ new 2013-02-25 17:31:36.783526559 +0100 > @@ -1379,7 +1379,6 @@ > c15295d7477ccec489953299bd03a8e62f86e611 refs/tags/v1.8.0-rc2 > cd46259ebf2e624bcee2aaae05c36663d414e1a2 refs/tags/v1.8.0-rc2^= {} > 22ed067acc84eac8a0a72d20478a18aee4e25571 refs/tags/v1.8.0-rc3 > -87a5461fa7b30f7b7baf27204f10219d61500fbf refs/tags/v1.8.0-rc3^= {} > bfeb8b9ae0012cb61e026cbcd29664876abf5389 refs/tags/v1.8.0.1 > ed9fe755130891fc878bb2433204faffb534697b refs/tags/v1.8.0.1^{} > 63add1fb45e1ab7a76bb38bbb9467c91fdfaaa7e refs/tags/v1.8.0.2 > > Diffing with the output from next, diff tells me it's binary for some > reason, but looking manually, the peeled v1.8.0-rc3 tag isn't there > either. I haven't had time to bisect this, so I'm putting it out ther= e > in case anybody wants to investigate before I have time to dig into i= t. Interesting. "git ls-remote . | grep 1.8.0-" for maint, master, next and pu produce identical results for me, all showing peeled ones correctly.