From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] am -3: allow nonstandard -p<num> option
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:36:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vvcmqwbto.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120229025842.GA3585@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:58:42 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:24:54PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> When falling back to 3-way merge, we run "git apply" to synthesize the
>> fake ancestor tree by parsing the incoming patch, and another "git apply"
>> to apply the patch to the fake ancestor tree. Both invocation need to
>> be aware of the custom -p<num> setting to parse patches that were prepared
>> with non-standard src/dst prefix.
>
> Makes sense. One question:
> ...
> $git_apply_opt can have other stuff in it, too (from my cursory reading,
> it looks like --whitespace, --directory, --exclude, -C, --reject,
> --ignore-whitespace, and --ignore-space-change). Those options are now
> passed, too.
>
> Naively, I don't think it should be a problem. Many of them will do
> nothing (because the patch _should_ apply cleanly to the blobs it
> mentions). Some seem like an obvious improvement (e.g., "--directory"
> should be just as necessary as "-p", I would think). For something like
> "--whitespace=error", I would think we would have errored out already
> when we first tried to apply the patch. Or maybe not. I didn't test.
An honest answer is that I didn't think deeply if they matter ;-).
Certainly we would want to honor the original settings for whitespace
errors by propagating the option, so that we would reject or adjust when
synthesizing the fake ancestor tree the same way as we deal with them when
apply the patch for real.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-29 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-28 23:24 [PATCH 0/2] "am -3" and "--no-prefix" does not work well Junio C Hamano
2012-02-28 23:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] am -3: allow nonstandard -p<num> option Junio C Hamano
2012-02-29 2:58 ` Jeff King
2012-02-29 3:36 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2012-02-29 7:27 ` Jeff King
2012-02-28 23:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] test: "am -3" can accept non-standard -p<num> Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vvcmqwbto.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).