From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-format-patch should include a checksum Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:35:13 -0800 Message-ID: <7vvdeowcry.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <871vhcmr5b.fsf@trurl.pps.jussieu.fr> <7vljfkxxj9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7ir5pccp9n.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Juliusz Chroboczek X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 27 02:35:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NZwoX-0007jq-Ch for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:35:25 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752384Ab0A0BfV (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:35:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752776Ab0A0BfV (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:35:21 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:49242 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751746Ab0A0BfT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:35:19 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C66C94092; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:35:19 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Wpkzspw0zPy9JAXNu7qsv4Gw1Gs=; b=LzEeNU baGMqOmGb1A0o0wuyZkHWFS5zZ1dv7ZQZ2Z9c5ctmy72WEe4+iW3bUEczCYz4mbT PPKXmKSfpjUN6+uP0jJeW5tm42LdziDVGWdUFyM8lgP1PWSzknqdxaw96gL6xW26 Drt61AgFxV/eSvcp5SmOS50hIZa2hOjgutsZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Rg1YT/Hc1akYvvX0JImL65Y+eg956KbA ykkbtD9mLAQEVnXxdjl303nBpliywkRT24Rxqq5CFrSTEdmDwm7CnK4bEbyfPNwU JS42sTPdOa4tbqPnPc9R2l0MxqUaKytzNuhACn7VW3AQVWb2hLOJQ7ImqNZCvRZM pd7zFEx0Ieg= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475DF94090; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:35:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB4A594089; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:35:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <7ir5pccp9n.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> (Juliusz Chroboczek's message of "Wed\, 27 Jan 2010 02\:25\:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 392F43E8-0AE4-11DF-93CE-6AF7ED7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Juliusz Chroboczek writes: >> That wouldn't work either. People can, should, and do add extra things to >> the message before applying it. > > Shouldn't they remove the checksum line at the same time as they edit > a patch? Why force extra work on people, especially the ones who _receive_ patches, when they say they _don't_ want to have such a noise by default?