From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] What to you think about a loose status for submodules? Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:58:04 -0700 Message-ID: <7vvdi7fbg3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20091021160122.GA2067@book.hvoigt.net> <7vy6n4339k.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20091022194446.GA3944@book.hvoigt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jens Lehmann , Lars Hjemli To: Heiko Voigt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 22 21:58:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N13ns-0007Tn-DW for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:58:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756578AbZJVT6S (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:58:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756568AbZJVT6S (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:58:18 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:49265 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756512AbZJVT6R (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:58:17 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D576E81402; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:58:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+rXjPnUQt8T0LOrzLapU0eePoCE=; b=mUdNnw OpyZPkaqbpVnLKf3vWEhWpHb/c/Wq6xZnmc+tpKj9nWX36T9kttaW6E4prXFkokN je8sV3hw77Ya+UMsoTyqM/ZJ+WYEv6d3uq/BdArU20hK3AdpB3RJnNMEHHfVl9p9 XjURAhgbRFmPSodNF7LDF3M0QOXUkhz+bNz0k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=HdNOeVJA2k5JlDxddgdUm+yZ2fjQ9Owv qCYvbuDZHTMB5Sz2rfowzMs3VlmDF+9wGaM9bSKbjF+T9R3NoBGN55rp63KVHIAH 7QbIJDfboC2ZnokGPgWAvKekSIIiu6BmkQ8jPMckLj5c+Wm3v3VT9cPchB3Vh901 SDp2fj0RU2g= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD12813FF; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:58:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DE22813FD; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:58:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20091022194446.GA3944@book.hvoigt.net> (Heiko Voigt's message of "Thu\, 22 Oct 2009 21\:44\:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3D11631E-BF45-11DE-B46C-A67CBBB5EC2E-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Heiko Voigt writes: > I am not sure what is the best way to create such a group mapping using > our config files though. I would like to allow multiple groups/views to > have the submodules like: > > [submodule "doc"] > path = Documentation > views = doc > > [submodule "help"] > path = help > views = doc > > [submodule "core"] > path = core > views = doc default > > [submodule "app"] > path = app > views = default > > What do you think? That, or alternatively: [submodule "doc"] path = Documentation [submodule "help"] path = help [submodule "core"] path = core [submodule "app"] path = app [view "default"] modules = core app [view "doc"] modules = core doc help Or even (mimicking the way how "git remote" defines remote groups): [submodule "doc"] path = Documentation [submodule "help"] path = help [submodule "core"] path = core [submodule "app"] path = app [submodule] default = core app doc = core doc help