From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fetch: Strip usernames from url's before storing them Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:36:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7vvdozk9gx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vbpqxvnpl.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1239956411-11195-1-git-send-email-ae@op5.se> <49EC26BC.5070505@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 20 10:38:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lvp1B-0007eO-GW for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:38:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753233AbZDTIgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:36:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753156AbZDTIgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:36:40 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:55182 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752905AbZDTIgg (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:36:36 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0B810386; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:36:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BAE810385; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:36:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <49EC26BC.5070505@op5.se> (Andreas Ericsson's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:39:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5B8058EC-2D86-11DE-867B-DC76898A30C1-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andreas Ericsson writes: > We've used this patch in production the past couple of days. > All tests pass and it works just fine. Any issues with it I > should fix, or did it just slip through? The latter, and a bit of my slowing down on handling new feature patches during the pre-release freeze. Will queue.