From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: allow send-email to run outside a repo Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:39:29 -0800 Message-ID: <7vvdrdzfmm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1234589913-67684-1-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Pierre Habouzit To: Jay Soffian X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 14 07:41:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LYEDV-00053J-7q for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:41:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751251AbZBNGjg (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:39:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751228AbZBNGjg (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:39:36 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:58870 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751025AbZBNGjg (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:39:36 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3ED2B182; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:39:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 820C82B181; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:39:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1234589913-67684-1-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com> (Jay Soffian's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:38:33 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3E7CD560-FA62-11DD-BFA3-6F7C8D1D4FD0-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jay Soffian writes: > This is on top of my previous send-email commits from tonight. I'm not > sure whether it applies cleanly otherwise. I think unlike the --suppress-cc ones that are about changing semantics (and it does not matter "to a much saner one"), this is a fix that is more important for the upcoming release. Splitting Cc list and folding headers also fall into the same category, I think. I'd prefer a rebased series to have fixes first and then enhancements. Thanks.