From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: PJ Hyett <pjhyett@gmail.com>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bad objects error since upgrading GitHub servers to 1.6.1
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:06:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vvds0z1c1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bab6a2ab0901271634x7201130bx4a565bd8bea6967b@mail.gmail.com> (PJ Hyett's message of "Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:34:20 -0800")
PJ Hyett <pjhyett@gmail.com> writes:
>> As we do not know what version github used to run (or for that matter what
>> custom code it adds to 1.6.1), I guessed that the previous one was 1.6.0.6
>> and did some comparison. The client side pack_object() learned to take
>> alternates on the server side into account to avoid pushing objects that
>> the target repository has through its alternates, so it is not totally
>> unexpected the client side changes its behaviour depending on what the
>> server does.
>
> The only custom code we've written was a patch to git-daemon to map
> pjhyett/github.git to a sharded location (eg.
> /repositories/1/1e/df/a0/pjhyett/github.git) instead of the default.
>
> The new alternates code in 1.6.1 sounds like that could be the issue.
It could be.
With the old server, when project A has a forked project A1, and A1
borrows (via alternates) objects from A, pushing into A1 did not look at
refs in A's repository (this all happens on the server end).
With the new server, the server side also advertises the tips of A's
branches as commits that are fully connected, when the client side tries
to push into A1. Older clients ignored this advertisement, so when they
pushed into A1, because their push did not depend on what's in repository
A on the server end, did not get affected if repository A (not A1) is
corrupted. A new client talking to the server would be affected because
it believes what the server says.
Older client ignores this advertisement, so if you are seeing trouble
reports from people who use older clients, then you can dismiss this
conjecture as unrelated. But if you see the issue only from people with
new clients, this could be just exposing a repository corruption of A (not
A1) on the server end that people did not know about before.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-28 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-27 23:04 Bad objects error since upgrading GitHub servers to 1.6.1 PJ Hyett
2009-01-27 23:10 ` PJ Hyett
2009-01-27 23:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-27 23:39 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-27 23:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 0:15 ` PJ Hyett
2009-01-28 0:34 ` PJ Hyett
2009-01-28 1:06 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-01-28 1:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 1:38 ` [PATCH] send-pack: Filter unknown commits from alternates of the remote Björn Steinbrink
2009-01-28 1:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 3:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 3:58 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-01-28 4:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 4:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 1:44 ` Bad objects error since upgrading GitHub servers to 1.6.1 Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 1:57 ` PJ Hyett
2009-01-28 2:02 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-28 3:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 3:30 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-28 3:52 ` Stephen Bannasch
2009-01-28 3:57 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-28 5:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 4:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 4:41 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-28 7:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 7:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 7:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] send-pack: do not send unknown object name from ".have" to pack-objects Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 15:45 ` Bad objects error since upgrading GitHub servers to 1.6.1 Linus Torvalds
2009-01-28 19:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 7:55 ` Jeff King
2009-01-28 8:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 8:17 ` Jeff King
2009-01-28 16:16 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-28 18:16 ` Jeff King
2009-01-28 18:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 8:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 9:24 ` Jeff King
2009-01-28 16:09 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-01-28 16:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-28 18:11 ` Jeff King
2009-01-28 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-28 1:15 ` Björn Steinbrink
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vvds0z1c1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjhyett@gmail.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).