From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] http-push: remove MOVE step after PUT when sending objects to server Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:43:25 -0800 Message-ID: <7vvdscthmq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7viqod5thi.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vocy4wfb2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ray Chuan , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 18 22:45:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LOfRx-00043Q-NX for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:44:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751528AbZARVnd (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:43:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751385AbZARVnd (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:43:33 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:57470 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750939AbZARVnd (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:43:33 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3F5911BD; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:43:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92A40911BC; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:43:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:14:44 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0CA99564-E5A9-11DD-BCB5-5720C92D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin writes: >> >> > Which unfortunately means that put && move must stay. >> >> I still do not understand why it is unfortunate. > > Because it is slow. If "slow" is a problem, why are you using http to begin with ;-)? I'd take slow but reliable any day over fast and mostly works but unreliable.