From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH (MINGW) Resend] Windows: Make OpenSSH properly detect tty detachment. Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:55:05 -0800 Message-ID: <7vvdv0iyl2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200811022011.13970.angavrilov@gmail.com> <49129E47.4080209@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Gavrilov , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 06 17:57:12 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ky8AQ-0007YP-Q7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:57:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752601AbYKFQzr (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:55:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752568AbYKFQzq (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:55:46 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:34158 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752435AbYKFQzp (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:55:45 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E04798AF; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:55:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D69F3798A4; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:55:17 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C032415E-AC23-11DD-9D6E-9CEDC82D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > The latest "What's cooking in git.git" report still doesn't mention this > patch. The reason might be ... Sorry, my mistake. >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gavrilov >> Acked-by: Johannes Sixt >> --- >> >> This patch appears to have been overlooked, Indeed. It was lost in the noise because it was marked MinGW and I failed to see your Ack. Do people build and test MinGW port out of my 'next'? If so, I'll queue this on its own topic branch and have it go through the usual "cook then graduate" cycle. Otherwise, I'll apply this directly on top of 'master'. Thanks.