From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: gitweb status for 1.6.0? Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:28:27 -0700 Message-ID: <7vvdyjcdj8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080802211714.GG24723@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" To: Jakub Narebski , Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 02 23:29:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KPOfS-0006ep-Ea for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:29:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751997AbYHBV2g (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:28:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751942AbYHBV2g (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:28:36 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:49132 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751785AbYHBV2f (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:28:35 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8A547231; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:28:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 500C247230; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:28:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080802211714.GG24723@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Sat, 2 Aug 2008 14:17:14 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F6298096-60D9-11DD-B052-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > We're getting ready for the git 1.6 release in the not-too-distant > future, and that will ship with gitgui-0.11. Thanks. There have been a handful gitweb patches on the list recently (I think they were all post -rc0 feature enhancements, but I may be mistaken). I'm wondering what their status are. Does any of them matter in the current cycle? By the way, I've privately pinged Paul for gitk status.