From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Path filtered history not maximally simplified Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:52:25 -0700 Message-ID: <7vve3eh6yu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <47E3AE38.5060405@viscovery.net> <47E3BCD5.2070405@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 22 20:53:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jd9mD-0005kJ-Rk for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:53:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751194AbYCVTwd (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:52:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751994AbYCVTwd (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:52:33 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:47472 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750937AbYCVTwc (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:52:32 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DE215AA; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:52:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A0E15A9; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:52:28 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > Ok, it turns out that M is an evil merge, i.e. the file in M is different > from both A and 3, but in such a way that it does not show up in a diff > --cc that has only 3 lines of context. In particular, one of the commits > 1, 2, 3 added a single line at an isolated spot in the file, and I undid > that addition in the merge commit M. > > Sorry for the noise. > > -- Hannes > > (So, *that's* why they are called "evil"!) Just a nomenclature, but independent changes merged trivially cleanly are "normal" merges, not evil. Evil merges are the ones that actually change the result in such a way that new lines in --cc output do not have _any_ counterpart in any of the parents.