From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unclear error message in "git remote update"
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:10:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vve3s7cjp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2008-03-09-13-37-55+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> (Samuel Tardieu's message of "Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:37:55 +0100")
Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net> writes:
> One of my colleague seems to have destroyed one of its head in his
> private repository. When fetching from it through "git remote update"
> using next, the repository name is not output:
>
> % git remote update
> error: refs/heads/2.0-uobjects points nowhere!
>
> Using master, I get:
>
> % git remote update
> Updating core
> Updating matthieu
> error: refs/heads/2.0-uobjects points nowhere!
> Updating origin
>
> which is IMO much clearer. Also, I like seeing what remote repository
> it is updating from in case anything gets stuck or slow.
>
> Any objection to reinstating the message as does the following patch?
I do not have objections, but it feels that the message for normal case
(success) is cluttering the output.
If the remote repository is in a bad shape to solicit a "points nowhere"
error, perhaps
(1) that error message should be squelched out completely, as it does not
affect the outcome of the fetch anyway, or
(2) the dangling symref should cause "fetch" to error out but with a
different error status than the total failure case, so that this
caller can tell it is a non-grave error, or
(3) the dangling symref should actually make the fetch fail, as the
remote repository is corrupt.
For now I'll take your patch, but this is something we may want to
clean-up in 1.6.0 timeframe.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-09 12:37 Unclear error message in "git remote update" Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-09 20:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-12 5:10 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vve3s7cjp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@rfc1149.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).