From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-commit: add a prepare-commit-msg hook
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:44:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vve5mx0hd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4794972F.9000007@gnu.org> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:59:27 +0100")
Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> writes:
>> Actually, reading your patch again I think it also triggers for
>> "-c", as well as for "[-C|-F|-m] ... -e".
>
> Not for "-c", that's the point of the "edit_message" check. You're
> right about "-e" though.
>
> Points taken, and patch will be resubmitted after 1.5.4.
Thanks. I think the approach is sane, and it naturally falls
into the second category of "why we might want to a hook for"
list I sent earlier.
I do not think adding "-X makes that hook ignored" for
description of every option is warranted, though. Users should
not have to be reminded that there is a hook he may never use
and it does not trigger if he specifies his own message using -X
or -Y or -Z option.
The usage of the hook is optional, and the primary description
of what it does and why a user might want to use it should be in
its own description (perhaps in hooks.txt and a section that
lists hooks in git-commit manpage). As long as that description
makes it clear that the hook is a way to specify a dynamic
template in a situation that requries a fresh message, the users
who are interested in using it would perfectly well understand
that options that make git-commit not to take a fresh message
would not invoke the hook.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-21 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 14:51 [PATCH] git-commit: add a prepare-commit-msg hook Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 15:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-18 15:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 16:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-18 16:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 18:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-18 18:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 19:01 ` Benoit Sigoure
2008-01-18 19:05 ` Alex Riesen
2008-01-18 19:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-18 21:08 ` Alex Riesen
2008-01-18 22:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-19 9:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-19 11:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-19 15:41 ` Benoit Sigoure
2008-01-19 16:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-20 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-21 6:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-21 11:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-21 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-21 12:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-21 12:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-21 22:44 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-21 14:27 Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vve5mx0hd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).