From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Li Yang-r58472 <LeoLi@freescale.com>,
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Change to use explicitly function call cgi->escapHTML()
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:53:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vveheprsc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070306104127.GA13096@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 6 Mar 2007 05:41:27 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:31:23PM +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
>
>> Yes, it also fixed the problem. I'm not very familiar with perl. Will
>> CGI::autoEscape(1) change CGI action for other users of CGI module on
>> the system? If so, maybe it will break other CGIs.
>
> I don't know enough about mod_perl to say, but if all scripts share the
> package globals from CGI, then yes, you're affecting all other scripts.
> Without mod_perl, obviously you have no impact.
>
> If it is the case, then your original fix is probably better.
But then you are letting _other_ mod_perl users to affect your
behaviour, aren't you? "sub autoEscape" does this:
sub autoEscape {
my($self,$escape) = self_or_default(@_);
my $d = $self->{'escape'};
$self->{'escape'} = $escape;
$d;
}
If we worry about mod_perl (provided if $CGI::Q is shared across
mod_perl users), I suspect we would need to be a bit more
paranoid, perhaps like this, woudln't we?
---
diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
index 653ca3c..9c4e060 100755
--- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
+++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ our $cgi = new CGI;
our $version = "++GIT_VERSION++";
our $my_url = $cgi->url();
our $my_uri = $cgi->url(-absolute => 1);
+$cgi->autoEscape(1);
# core git executable to use
# this can just be "git" if your webserver has a sensible PATH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-06 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-06 3:58 [PATCH] gitweb: Change to use explicitly function call cgi->escapHTML() Li Yang
2007-03-06 6:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-06 9:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-06 9:39 ` Jeff King
2007-03-06 9:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-06 10:31 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-03-06 10:41 ` Jeff King
2007-03-06 10:53 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2007-03-06 10:56 ` Jeff King
2007-03-06 10:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-06 11:01 ` Jeff King
2007-03-06 11:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-06 11:07 ` Jeff King
2007-03-06 11:07 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-03-06 10:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-06 13:23 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-06 23:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-07 0:37 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-07 0:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-07 1:21 ` [PATCH] gitweb: Don't escape attributes in CGI.pm HTML methods Jakub Narebski
2007-03-07 1:40 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vveheprsc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=LeoLi@freescale.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).