From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Show trailing slash when listing tree entry in tree listing Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:57:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7vvemsymdx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061010191904.99261.qmail@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 10 21:57:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXNjK-0008My-O0 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:57:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030236AbWJJT5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:57:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030239AbWJJT5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:57:32 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:10693 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030236AbWJJT5b (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:57:31 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061010195730.FRDD6235.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:57:30 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id YjxZ1V00E1kojtg0000000 Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:57:33 -0400 To: ltuikov@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20061010191904.99261.qmail@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Luben Tuikov's message of "Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:19:04 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luben Tuikov writes: > Or, > "Click on the 'blob' link to get the ... Click on the 'tree' link to > get the ... Oh you didn't know what a 'tree' or 'blob' object is? > A 'blob' is ... A 'tree' is ..." > > At which point the engineer has lost 90% of his interest. > > It even gets even worse for the obnoxious "tree" link next to each commit > in shortlog view: > "The tree link is the the tree object which is part of a commit object. > Oh you don't know the internals of a commit object? A commit object > binds a tree object and a (parent) commit object, but blah, blah, blah..." Isn't that a simple "labelling" question? I do not think anybody minds to show clickable string "contents" (instead of "blob" or "tree") at the places you mention above and if we did so everybody would be happy, right?