From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Cleanup Git logo and Git logo target generation
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:00:50 -0700
Message-ID: <7vvemtdfst.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
References: <20060919212725.GA13132@pasky.or.cz> <egbogh$d7d$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<7vac46gvg8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
	<200610090914.59834.jnareb@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 09 11:01:25 2006
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GWr0J-0005DP-7c
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:00:55 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932409AbWJIJAw (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Mon, 9 Oct 2006 05:00:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932417AbWJIJAw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 05:00:52 -0400
Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30]:50382 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao09.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932409AbWJIJAv (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 Oct 2006 05:00:51 -0400
Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72])
          by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP
          id <20061009090051.FKMT16798.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>;
          Mon, 9 Oct 2006 05:00:51 -0400
Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80])
	by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp
	id Y90t1V00B1kojtg0000000
	Mon, 09 Oct 2006 05:00:53 -0400
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200610090914.59834.jnareb@gmail.com> (Jakub Narebski's message
	of "Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:14:59 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/28565>

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Partial improvement is better than no improvement.

Not necessarily.  As the maintainer, I found that when we say
"we will fix it later", later tend to never come, and one
effective way to fight that tendency is to prod the contributors
a bit harder, which worked reasonably well so far.