From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] fmt-merge-msg: avoid open "-|" list form for Perl 5.6 Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:25:59 -0800 Message-ID: <7vveuw48uw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060302164405.GB7292@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060302165510.GB18929@spearce.org> <20060302220930.GE6183@steel.home> <7v1wxk5ptf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 03 02:26:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEz3W-0005k4-BT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 02:26:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752119AbWCCB0B (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:26:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752120AbWCCB0B (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:26:01 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38]:26770 "EHLO fed1rmmtao01.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752119AbWCCB0B (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:26:01 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060303012442.ZIKA15695.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:24:42 -0500 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:49:26 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > Yeah, I actually looked at a few examples, so I knew what it was basically > trying to do, and then I ignored it as not interesting to the exercise, > which was to abuse the new revision listing library in interesting ways by > calling it multiple times. Abuse is exactly the word. The reason it is an abuse is exactly why you said "... but to fix it you'd have to actualyl walk the parent list yourself, rather than letting get_revision do it all for you." Which relates to the fact that object.c layer is not designed to be used multiple times... Maybe we want to make object.c layer reusable first?