From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: t9902 fails Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:12:12 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwqvbs61v.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1358256924-31578-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <20130115232400.GA16147@sigill.intra.peff.net> <50F64597.2070100@web.de> <201301172347.50157.avila.jn@gmail.com> <20130118000454.GI13449@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl?= AVILA , Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Felipe Contreras To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 18 01:12:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TvzZX-0001Lm-6m for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:12:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754685Ab3ARAMU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:12:20 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:33430 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754064Ab3ARAMQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:12:16 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2C0B437; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:12:15 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+Y/xi5hkYOyhdW3kyW4wQ92W3ho=; b=gWKy1D ytFjeAUj9afzVEB/TetZhF/SlMQjzg7ccbCx9mJocKI9WtwBkcGEu4B6fqqqCbuT sP0SvH7JZxXIsQRiA0iF6L2EYxFem+QcsdZPf8nasrXrGxc4uoirrSsCROrRW1AX gyXKXKrFupglMq2gj0M9VdPtN1FR+pO3Hrkjc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nhg1g4iLsRjgKbjF4y93JJ2Qlj+BQtwm bvIltxL+DN3Gk833oWZcWUdhQf691jYn55gG7wUw8kktvwdxmE5Y8MnNtNV7dcQg k3CySPBD4OfD/iGw/JMPfzLsN3GVmiiO5kSd7kARRgOqa0DUjLQ4AGSqpaF0TPGA w1y+VfyxRiU= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D154DB436; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:12:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F684B433; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:12:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20130118000454.GI13449@google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:04:54 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B6BFB568-6103-11E2-B668-F0CE2E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder writes: > Thoughts? Maybe it would be enough to check that the intended get > commands are present in the completion list and other git commands are > not, ignoring binaries that might live elsewhere on the $PATH? Yeah, it would be a robust alternative approach to verify that (1) output is a superset of what we expect, and (2) they all share the string we fed to the machinery as the common prefix, I would think.