From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Finding all commits which modify a file Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:42:27 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwr8e13xo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <46043.208.70.151.129.1327095331.squirrel@mail.lo-cal.org> <4F1B4764.3010501@gmail.com> <41090.38.96.167.131.1327335283.squirrel@mail.lo-cal.org> <52932.38.96.167.131.1327422884.squirrel@mail.lo-cal.org> <30433.38.96.167.131.1327508582.squirrel@mail.lo-cal.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Santi =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9jar?= , "Linus Torvalds" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Neal Groothuis" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 26 23:42:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqY1e-000499-Bq for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:42:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754124Ab2AZWmc (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:42:32 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:56558 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753408Ab2AZWma (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:42:30 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547957AD4; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:42:29 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=8qoAMwBxO5+DWlqUM2BecUsf4qE=; b=M5CUt2 8sHQoSxZCzxU+M3hqXE42vxNF6pUNQ35CE+/BNTo812nueAs3s8YVF7GMzVueaNn o7zVAXxTG+TxIPjpV7rLjj/wDHE4CyGh5nNcNk5RkJy2JvlV6m2dAfIxC9yXTiZ8 QLZisJ0MTrGvFYq/f9JmKd7NN7S9qofE0hH4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=T+FBWbcDd5noWeOsbUzDkQJNO/L209wo 9B86wjAcBYIRz1SLGglw8jxyi8ivaBz3cyCespQ7aSBlbQaHS4nNZalHZLxTUsn9 SYZvP1tUuUPWZMmlQxvVSkl46LEiDqTdDioi8XwmweAIqdtLQaP1j6OkeuxdHLZM VJ/LvvbRwAE= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC4F7AD3; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:42:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D25FE7AD2; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:42:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <30433.38.96.167.131.1327508582.squirrel@mail.lo-cal.org> (Neal Groothuis's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:23:02 -0500 (EST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 06B20A70-486F-11E1-893F-9DB42E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Neal Groothuis" writes: > Is there a situation where checking for TREESAMEness before simplification > is desirable and checking after would not be? When you do not want to see a side branch that does not contribute to the end result at all, obviously ;-). Outside that situation, before or after should not make a difference, I would think.