From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsck: print progress Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:56:13 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwrbhdixe.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20111103033325.GA10230@sigill.intra.peff.net> <1320310234-11243-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <20111103193826.GB19483@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vd3d9f0u8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20111103195147.GA21318@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v8vnxeyrp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20111103202954.GC19483@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 03 21:56:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM4Kk-0006TI-2w for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:56:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751655Ab1KCU4Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:56:16 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:46867 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751588Ab1KCU4P (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:56:15 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEB46552; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:56:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=5uUOl8zGEGkY8Ir5+EvYLrK52W4=; b=Bkbn8O LeigW+1sAgWPqfrZgMhPMgyzQ/YER4GFGq49EkPV/OtYy13wyPcbuuEdnjIHqAfP NXnZeSwbKBgKeMYK4cjm+U3KPprDZcoHfGYOuBGMbDNh3fVZC0WEMmRxr7jmoCFu NShlBkNtWkacc+dg6eszRRtOgE2KBnVlaPwrI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=T5nDyUn6dDw63zT+oj3Ccsom8qXARzzB MdvQi0VyD9UcE16bOkKlLVr9fs/H3rS0vqEx1pSCkuZpOKTycyqgESMzokOaeR5C 0ELfs8BHNEr4HVfa52CaGMvpyGARhdMi6qlPHCeRUPGV+zMUeWkZdnhqpOKFl7wt rkU8lyD3R5g= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B376551; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:56:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1F59654F; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:56:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20111103202954.GC19483@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:29:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 44CB8668-065E-11E1-A559-9DB42E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > So you would agree that we are better summing the objects for all packs > and showing one big progress bar? If it can be done without sacrificing the clarity of the code, compared to the "we will do new and smaller ones first so in practice it does not matter" approach taken by the patch in question, I would not mind it, but to be honest, I do not deeply care either way.