git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] config: add core.sharedconfig
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:13:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vwrnig6gr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291907388-9068-4-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> ("Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy"'s message of "Thu\,  9 Dec 2010 22\:09\:48 +0700")

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> core.sharedconfig can take anything that resolves to a blob.
> $GIT_DIR/config will override the shared config. Nested shared
> config is not allowed.
>
> No protection is provided. It's up to the project to maintain good
> config. The config could be in a separate branch that only a few
> people are allowed to push, for example. To be safest, just put SHA-1
> there.
>
> git-fsck and git-prune should learn about this key and protect it from
> being pruned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Hopefully nobody sets core.sharedconfig = :path/to/config or similar
>
>  And I should not open $GIT_DIR/config twice. Well, it does not hurt
>  much.

That kind of sloppy thinking adds up, though.

> @@ -910,6 +918,12 @@ int git_config(config_fn_t fn, void *data)
>  
>  	repo_config = git_pathdup("config");
>  	if (!access(repo_config, R_OK)) {
> +		git_config_from_file(get_shared_config, repo_config, NULL);
> +		if (core_shared_config) {
> +			ret += git_config_from_sha1(fn, core_shared_config, data);
> +			found += 1;
> +		}
> +

What is the point of this "found++" when you will increment it for finding
the repository-local configuration anyway?

>  		ret += git_config_from_file(fn, repo_config, data);
>  		found += 1;
>  	}

I originally liked what the first two tried to do, but think about the use
case.  How would this whole thing work?

 - The user clones from the project to get a repository with a working
   tree;

 - The user somehow learns that s/he can run one command to get
   project-wide preference of the project:

     $ git config core.sharedconfig refs/remotes/origin/config:git.config

 - Everything hopefully should work the way project wishes in that blob,
   unless the end user later overrides them by adding different settings
   to .git/config.

How is that different from:

 - The user clones from the project to get a repository with a working
   tree;

 - The user somehow learns that s/he can run one command to get
   project-wide preference of the project:

     $ ./setup-project-preference.sh

   Typically, such a ./setup-project-preference.sh script would only
   consist of a series of "git config $foo $bar", so any user who can say
   "git config core.sharedconfig $foo" should be able to use it as well.

 - Everything should work the way project wishes with the settings made to
   .git/config by the script, unless the end user later overrides them by
   modifying settings in .git/config.

One minor difference is that some configuration variables are additive,
and you cannot subtract from them with your approach.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-09 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-09 15:09 [RFC/WIP 0/3] Shared config Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-12-09 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] config: read full file content before parsing Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-12-09 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] config: add git_config_from_sha1() to read from a blob Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-12-09 15:58   ` Thiago Farina
2010-12-09 17:02     ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-12-09 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] config: add core.sharedconfig Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2010-12-09 16:00   ` Thiago Farina
2010-12-10  1:53     ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-12-09 18:13   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2010-12-09 18:19     ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-12-10  1:29     ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vwrnig6gr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).