From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: how to force a commit date matching info from a mbox ? Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:37:31 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwscm1nic.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vljt26fp9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <46d6db660901221441q60eb90bdge601a7a250c3a247@mail.gmail.com> <20090123094529.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git list , Christian MICHON To: Nanako Shiraishi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 23 08:39:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LQGd5-0001oI-45 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:39:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752914AbZAWHhj (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:37:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751179AbZAWHhi (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:37:38 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:32795 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751172AbZAWHhi (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:37:38 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0B61D171; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:37:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BFE21D16F; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:37:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20090123094529.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> (Nanako Shiraishi's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:45:29 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B4BFC5D2-E920-11DD-BDD6-BE78113D384A-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nanako Shiraishi writes: > Quoting Junio C Hamano : > >> Perhaps something like this totally untested patch. > > You have test scripts already, but you say it is untested? Correct. I did not run that new test, let alone existing ones ;-)