From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2009, #02; Sun, 11) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:19:46 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwsd1pjst.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v63kmtbk6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 11 23:21:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LM8gc-0003c3-HF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:21:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754519AbZAKWTy (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:19:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754502AbZAKWTx (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:19:53 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:33262 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249AbZAKWTx (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:19:53 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12741C45D; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:19:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC4E41C45C; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:19:48 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F74F2BE6-E02D-11DD-A406-2E3B113D384A-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> [Actively cooking] >> >> * sc/gitweb-category (Fri Dec 12 00:45:12 2008 +0100) 3 commits >> - gitweb: Optional grouping of projects by category >> - gitweb: Split git_project_list_body in two functions >> - gitweb: Modularized git_get_project_description to be more generic > > This I think needs some further cooking. I guess with addition of one > more patch to series categories could be sorted together with projects > they contain, and not always have to be in fixed ordering. These should be moved to the Stalled category; nobody seems to be discussing improvements and sending updates to the series as far as I recall. >> * gb/gitweb-patch (Thu Dec 18 08:13:19 2008 +0100) 4 commits >> - gitweb: link to patch(es) view in commit(diff) and (short)log view >> - gitweb: add patches view >> - gitweb: change call pattern for git_commitdiff >> - gitweb: add patch view > > If I remember correctly the only point of discussion is calling > convention for git_commitdiff, and whether 'patches' view should > (re)use git_commitdiff or use its own subroutine. Thanks; I take it that it is basically usable, useful and can be incrementally improved in 'next'?