From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Cc: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2008, #06; Wed, 26)
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:45:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vwsecejhc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0811301509070.19665@iabervon.org> (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:26:19 -0500 (EST)")
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes:
>> As I said, CE_VALID implies all files are present.
>
> My first question is whether this actually should be true.
If the user says "Please pretend that I have never touched this file",
which is what "assume unchanged" is all about, I think we should not
notice if the user removes one of such files from the working tree, just
like we don't notice (rather, pretend not to notice) if the user modified
it.
I am inclined to think that we should rather treat that as a bug.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-07 3:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-27 0:28 What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2008, #06; Wed, 26) Junio C Hamano
2008-11-27 22:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-28 2:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-28 11:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-28 19:20 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-29 0:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-29 0:15 ` [PATCH] git add --intent-to-add: fix removal of cached emptiness Junio C Hamano
2008-11-29 3:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] builtin-rm.c: explain and clarify the "local change" logic Junio C Hamano
2008-11-29 3:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] git add --intent-to-add: fix removal of cached emptiness Junio C Hamano
2008-11-29 15:38 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-11-30 19:21 ` Jeff King
2008-11-29 3:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] git add --intent-to-add: do not let an empty blob committed by accident Junio C Hamano
2008-11-30 19:14 ` Jeff King
2008-12-01 9:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-29 1:25 ` What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2008, #06; Wed, 26) Daniel Barkalow
2008-11-29 13:02 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-11-30 10:29 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-11-30 21:26 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-12-06 17:26 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-12-06 18:39 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-12-07 12:27 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-12-07 21:26 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-12-08 12:51 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-12-08 19:41 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-12-11 13:04 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-12-11 20:30 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-12-12 1:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-12 2:40 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-12-12 3:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-12 3:36 ` Jeff King
2008-12-12 16:13 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-12-12 16:45 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-12-12 16:54 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-12-13 5:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-13 5:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-12 16:08 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-12-07 3:45 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vwsecejhc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).