From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git sequencer prototype Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:09:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwsk1ti6y.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1214879914-17866-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> <20080704210052.GA6984@steel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephan Beyer , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 05 00:11:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KEtUk-0007DD-NE for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:11:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754080AbYGDWJ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:09:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753997AbYGDWJz (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:09:55 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:48600 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756862AbYGDWJy (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:09:54 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB7E18B77; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:09:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE19D18B6E; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:09:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080704210052.GA6984@steel.home> (Alex Riesen's message of "Fri, 4 Jul 2008 23:00:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EC9F8D48-4A15-11DD-9528-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Riesen writes: > Stephan Beyer, Tue, Jul 01, 2008 04:38:30 +0200: >> Hi, >> >> here is the patchset for the git-sequencer prototype, documentation, >> test suite and a first git-am and git-rebase-i migration. >> Indeed, monster patches. ;) > > BTW, how about renaming it in something short: git seq. There is > already a seq(1) in GNU coreutils, which does roughly the same (prints > a sequence of numbers), why not reuse the name? Is it advantageous to use shorter but less descriptive name for this command? It will be a backend to am/rebase and not something the users will type from the command line, won't it?