From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: The meaning of x~0 and x~ as rev-spec. Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:24:45 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwso5p92q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <87bq5ho31d.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Organov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 14 17:25:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JaCiy-0000vh-8J for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:25:40 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754384AbYCNQZB (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:25:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754132AbYCNQZB (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:25:01 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:58646 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753446AbYCNQZA (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:25:00 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C7D1A69; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:24:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E2B1A3E; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:24:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87bq5ho31d.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> (Sergei Organov's message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:20:30 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sergei Organov writes: > Testing suggests that ~0 and ~ are the same and are just > synonyms for as rev-specs. Is that correct? Is that by design, or > by accident? sed -n -e '/name~3/,/x = 0;/p' sha1_name.c