From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry. Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:18:11 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwsq458vw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vfxwu9s2z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <07FDB6ED-EBE0-4F66-9167-6A0F8AD58E2B@zib.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List To: Steffen Prohaska X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 21 01:19:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JGkNQ-0001z5-S7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:19:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755093AbYAUASb (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:18:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755271AbYAUASa (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:18:30 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:46210 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754388AbYAUAS3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:18:29 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49B622B6; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:18:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3090422B5; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:18:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <07FDB6ED-EBE0-4F66-9167-6A0F8AD58E2B@zib.de> (Steffen Prohaska's message of "Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:33:06 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Steffen Prohaska writes: > On Jan 20, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >>> I bet you'll see a much bigger performance improvement from this on >>> Windows in particular. >> >> I bet so, too. Traditionally, filesystem calls are painfully slow on >> Windows. >> >> But I cannot test before Monday, so I would not be mad if somebody >> else >> could perform some tests on Windows. > > Has someone collected the whole series on a topic branch? Yes, I have. Haven't pushed it out, though.