From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Many things pushed out to 'master' Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:58:42 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwsrvh4vx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vk5nwu51x.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vabosse23.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vbq98jdy5.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v1wa3iquj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 03 21:59:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IzINh-0002Fw-2z for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:59:09 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751059AbXLCU6t (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:58:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751060AbXLCU6s (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:58:48 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:46209 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751059AbXLCU6s (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:58:48 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBDA2F0; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:59:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1769B6D7; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:59:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:39:14 +0000 (GMT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin writes: >> >> > But I remembered that you requested a mode for signed tags where they >> > would just be copied. I just realised while implementing "verbatim" >> > that "ignore" does just that. Maybe we should rename this mode to >> > "verbatim"? >> > >> > And maybe you want to make it the default (even if I think that this >> > will result in more surprise moments than the current mode which >> > aborts). >> >> I did not hear others agreeing with me, so let's respect the original >> author's thinking. > > But the original author already admitted that the original naming was > stupid... Ok, send in updates, please.