From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make usage documentation for git-blame and git-annotate consistent.
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:40:29 -0700
Message-ID: <7vwsvisybm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
References: <20070826031951.GB7644@ruiner>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 26 06:40:35 2007
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IP9vO-0002RA-Tx
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 06:40:35 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751837AbXHZEkc (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:40:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751998AbXHZEkc
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:40:32 -0400
Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:48888 "EHLO
	sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751573AbXHZEkb (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:40:31 -0400
Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBFA126FFF
	for <git@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:40:52 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20070826031951.GB7644@ruiner> (Brian Hetro's message of "Sat, 25
	Aug 2007 23:19:51 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/56673>

Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net> writes:

> Added git-annotate usage in the synopsis.

I'd rather not do this.  The git-annotate wrapper is a
transitional measure for backward compatibility, and I do not
think we should advertise the options that are added in
git-blame there, even though the command option parser is lazy
and does not turn them off.  Ideally disabling non annotate
options would be a good thing to have if it were free, but I do
not think it is worth it.