From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] describe: Add unlisted option Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:54:13 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwswrlcui.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <87sl7fmyca.wl@mail2.atmark-techno.com> <20070723070308.GH32566@spearce.org> <7vabtnmusm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070723074736.GJ32566@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yasushi SHOJI , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 23 10:54:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ICtgU-0008UO-Ao for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:54:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761239AbXGWIyS (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763281AbXGWIyR (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:17 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.241.43]:45991 "EHLO fed1rmmtao103.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763024AbXGWIyP (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:15 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070723085414.PRJF1358.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:14 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id SwuD1X00K1kojtg0000000; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070723074736.GJ32566@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:47:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: >> I was actually going to suggest removing these options, that >> were primarily meant for debugging and tweaking while we figure >> out what the optimum default should be. Do you think they are >> worth keeping? > > Yea, I do. I'd like to keep them in the code as sometimes I do > look at their output. I'll even help maintain them, because they > change oh so often. ;-) > > But if you really want them gone, I won't stop you. Nah, I already noticed your Ack and inferred that you would want to keep them. Haven't applied the patches yet, though.