From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make fetch-pack a builtin with an internal API Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:39:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwsxaw2xu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 09 07:39:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I7lyM-0000ss-6x for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:39:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750849AbXGIFjn (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:39:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750759AbXGIFjn (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:39:43 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.241.43]:41008 "EHLO fed1rmmtao103.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750750AbXGIFjm (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:39:42 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070709053941.BJYL19529.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:39:41 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id MHfh1X00P1kojtg0000000; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:39:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:10:16 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Are _identifiers with leading underscore Kosher thing to do, I wonder... We do have ones with trailing ones (mostly qsort functions) and I think they are done that way for the sake of standards conformance. Gone is a "#if 0/#endif" which is good. diff --git a/fetch-pack.h b/fetch-pack.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2bd05a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/fetch-pack.h @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +#ifndef FETCH_PACK_API We seem to say "#ifndef FETCH_PACK_H" in such a case, though. Nobody seems to call setup_fetch_pack() yet. How complete is this patch meant to be? The program is somehow much more pleasant to follow, even though there is no fundamental change anywhere.