From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Teach receive-pack how to keep pack files when unpacklooseobjects = 0. Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:52:21 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwt6hq8nu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061030223615.GH5775@spearce.org> <7vlkmxtmln.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v7iyhrsoi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061031063941.GB7375@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20061031063941.GB7375@spearce.org> (Shawn Pearce's message of "Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:39:41 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GenU3-0006GE-EQ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:52:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422674AbWJaGwY (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:52:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422821AbWJaGwY (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:52:24 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30]:4760 "EHLO fed1rmmtao09.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422674AbWJaGwX (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:52:23 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061031065223.QMFS16798.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:52:23 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id gus21V00D1kojtg0000000 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:52:03 -0500 To: Shawn Pearce Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Shawn Pearce writes: >> Because that approach assumes recieve-pack and unpack-objects >> and index-pack are from the same vintage (otherwise your >> receive-pack would need to have a way to see if unpack-objects >> and index-pack would grok --pack_header argument), we could even >> get away without passing the pack version if we wanted to. >... > BTW I think we do need to pass the pack version in the option. We are in agreement; I mentioned "we could ... if we wanted to" because I wanted to see if you are paying attention ;-).