From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Example Cogito Addon - cogito-bundle Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:13:37 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwt6xxofi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061018053647.GA3507@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20061018185225.GU20017@pasky.or.cz> <20061018185907.GV20017@pasky.or.cz> <7vy7rd1m4q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061018191834.GA18829@spearce.org> <20061018204626.GA19194@spearce.org> <20061018214143.GF19194@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Nicolas Pitre , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 19 00:13:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaJfS-0008Hg-R2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:13:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423072AbWJRWNk (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:13:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423073AbWJRWNj (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:13:39 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32]:2250 "EHLO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423072AbWJRWNj (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:13:39 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061018221338.IBQI28934.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:13:38 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id byDh1V01D1kojtg0000000 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:13:42 -0400 To: Shawn Pearce In-Reply-To: <20061018214143.GF19194@spearce.org> (Shawn Pearce's message of "Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:41:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn Pearce writes: > Ideally that thin pack would be repacked (along with the other > existing packs) as quickly as possible into a self-contained pack. It should not be hard to write another program that generates a packfile like pack-object does but taking a thin pack as its input. Then receive-pack can drive it instead of unpack-objects.