From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-format-patch: Make the second and subsequent mails replies to the first Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:32:27 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwtagnfsk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060710162920.GR20191@harddisk-recovery.com> <1152556878.8890.45.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com> <7vwtal9lu1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1152897407.5177.8.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com> <7v4pxkoxjp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1152904829.5177.19.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 14 21:32:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G1TOs-0007fD-19 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:32:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161067AbWGNTcb (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:32:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161294AbWGNTcb (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:32:31 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtai08.cox.net ([68.230.241.51]:59326 "EHLO fed1rmmtai08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161067AbWGNTca (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:32:30 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060714193229.LTAM8537.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:32:29 -0400 To: Josh Triplett In-Reply-To: <1152904829.5177.19.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com> (Josh Triplett's message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:20:28 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Josh Triplett writes: > ..., but you > suggested that you didn't mind having threading as the default. Did I? ... then that was either a mistake or miscommunication. I do mind changing the default output. I do not mind threading as the default ONLY IF user asks for output with these extra headers.