From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] Cache negative delta pairs Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:12:47 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwtazobkw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060628223744.GA24421@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7v4py4y7wo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060629180011.GA4392@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20060629185335.GA6704@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20060629195201.GA10786@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 30 00:12:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fw4ko-0006iV-Mg for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:12:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933040AbWF2WMv (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:12:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933039AbWF2WMu (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:12:50 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:59633 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933040AbWF2WMt (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:12:49 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060629221248.SJHC18458.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:12:48 -0400 To: Nicolas Pitre In-Reply-To: (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:47:09 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nicolas Pitre writes: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> > >> > > Instead of having a separate cache, wouldn't it be much better to just >> > > take the hint from the previous pack-file? >> > >> > DOH! ;-) >> >> Btw, I think this could do with a flag to turn it on/off (but probably >> default to on). > > I think it should simply be coupled with the --no-reuse-delta flag. I agree that makes sense.