From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some doc typo fixes Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:07:02 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwtbshp3d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060607125644.GT29682@craic.sysops.org> <7v1wu0lxnd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 07 19:07:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo1Uq-00066e-3j for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:07:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932346AbWFGRHE (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:07:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932344AbWFGRHE (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:07:04 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32]:3546 "EHLO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932346AbWFGRHD (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:07:03 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060607170702.WSPS11027.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:07:02 -0400 To: Francis Daly In-Reply-To: <7v1wu0lxnd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:48:38 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Francis Daly writes: > >> All should be clear enough, except perhaps committish / commitish. >> I just kept the more-used one within the current docs. > > Thanks. I am not a native, and this is very much appreciated. > >> . It could be named hierarchically (i.e. separated with slash >> - `/`), but each of its component cannot begin with a dot `.`; >> + `/`), but each of its components cannot begin with a dot `.`; > > I am not sure; ... Sheesh, I was reading the diff backwards. Sorry. > All the others look good. Thanks. All of them look obviously correct, it wasn't just obvious to me without enough caffeine. Sorry for the noise.