From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [TRIVIAL] Documentation: merge: one is required Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:48:12 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy6ppbvdf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1249995838.1589.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090811144253.GA12956@vidovic> <1250002681.2707.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht , git@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Bolle X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 12 04:48:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mb3t6-00051v-7u for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:48:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755740AbZHLCsT (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:48:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755663AbZHLCsT (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:48:19 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:57915 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755541AbZHLCsS (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:48:18 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2FB2681A; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:48:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 782E126819; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:48:13 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 96D53BCA-86EA-11DE-982B-AEF1826986A2-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Paul Bolle writes: >> Shoudn't be >> >> [-m ] [...] > > No, since "..." means one or more instances of the "" > option. Does it really? After you brought up this "one or more", I re-read the docs your patches touched, thinking that the author might have meant 'zero or more of A' with these '...' notation. And I realized that they made perfect sense. In general, you can write: ... and read this as "The can be followed by nothing or something (zero or more) of unspecified kind". If takes only one type of zero or more things, you can _clarify the ellipses_ by prefixing them with what kind of "stuff" you are talking about: ... and read this as "The can be followed by nothing or something (zero or more) of s". On the other hand, you can also say (note that the ellipses stand on their own and are not associated with ): ... and read this as "It takes one followed by nothing or something (zero or more) of unspecified kind".