From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@gmail.com>,
madduck@debian.org, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [topgit] tg update error
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:02:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vy6w93hdb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090213182609.GB31860@coredump.intra.peff.net
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:01:42PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > Junio, I think we should probably revert b229d18 (and loosen
>> > symbolic-ref's check to just "refs/"). Even if you want to argue that
>> > topgit should be changed to handle this differently, we are still
>> > breaking existing topgit installations, and who knows what other scripts
>> > which might have relied on doing something like this.
>>
>> I'm Ok with the revert (and I agree it is absolutely the right thing to do
>> at least for the short term).
>
> It looks like you have already pushed out the revert. But I think we
> need this on top to make topgit work correctly.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] symbolic-ref: allow refs/<whatever> in HEAD
>
> Commit afe5d3d5 introduced a safety valve to symbolic-ref to
> disallow installing an invalid HEAD. It was accompanied by
> b229d18a, which changed validate_headref to require that
> HEAD contain a pointer to refs/heads/ instead of just refs/.
> Therefore, the safety valve also checked for refs/heads/.
>
> As it turns out, topgit is using refs/top-bases/ in HEAD,
> leading us to re-loosen (at least temporarily) the
> validate_headref check made in b229d18a. This patch does the
> corresponding loosening for the symbolic-ref safety valve,
> so that the two are in agreement once more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Actually we should simply revert afe5d3d5 altogether with the above
message, as it introduced a test that expects the tightened behaviour.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-14 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-12 8:09 [topgit] tg update error Aneesh Kumar
2009-02-12 8:48 ` martin f krafft
2009-02-12 9:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-12 9:32 ` martin f krafft
2009-02-12 10:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-12 11:29 ` Bert Wesarg
2009-02-12 12:56 ` Jeff King
2009-02-12 12:59 ` Jeff King
2009-02-12 21:01 ` martin f krafft
2009-02-12 21:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-12 21:41 ` martin f krafft
2009-02-12 23:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-13 6:28 ` martin f krafft
2009-02-13 7:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-13 9:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-13 18:26 ` Jeff King
2009-02-14 2:02 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-02-14 2:08 ` Jeff King
2009-02-14 2:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-14 2:24 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vy6w93hdb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@gmail.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madduck@debian.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).