From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What is not in git.git Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:49:00 -0800 Message-ID: <7vy6wllswz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090205054918.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ecashin@coraid.com, arjen@yaph.org, joey@kitenet.net, benny.kra@googlemail.com, pw@padd.com, simon@lst.de, jidanni@jidanni.org, dirker@gmail.com, hoxu@users.sf.net To: Nanako Shiraishi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 04 23:50:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUqZw-0002lq-PV for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:50:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756815AbZBDWtS convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:49:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756476AbZBDWtR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:49:17 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:54251 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755994AbZBDWtR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:49:17 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFDF2A72C; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:49:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A83011CE63; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:49:02 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0CA40F00-F30E-11DD-95FC-6F7C8D1D4FD0-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nanako Shiraishi writes: > You keep mentioning 1.6.2 and I take it as a hint that the project is > approaching the pre release freeze. There are some patches sent to th= e > list that are not in git.git, and I am wondering what their statuses = are. > > 1. From: ecashin@coraid.com > Subject: [PATCH] git-describe documentation: --match pattern is g= lob > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:21:53 -0500 > Message-ID: > > I thought this was correct, but was missing a sign-off. Perhaps i= t was > dropped on the floor because it was sent in a wrong format that i= s > harder to apply? Mostly correct, but because we consider refnames like filesystem paths = and the use of globs when matching them is shared as the same basic design across commands, I do not think the manual page for each individual command is the right place to say it. > 2. From: Arjen Laarhoven > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] git-log: Follow file copies with 'git log --= follow -C -C' > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:37:25 +0100 > Message-ID: <1232642245-94405-2-git-send-email-arjen@yaph.org> > > Junio seemed to like the patch but asked a question; I did not se= e a > response nor updated patch (sorry, I do not read C and cannot com= ment > on the correctness of the patch). Thanks for a reminder, and no, don't be sorry. This type of "project secretary" help is very much appreciated, and you are demonstrating tha= t you do not have to know the code very intimately to do this, which is a= lso very good. > 3. From: Joey Hess > Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: support the rel=3Dvcs microformat > Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:25:18 -0500 > Message-ID: <20090107042518.GB24735@gnu.kitenet.net> > > A few exchanges of review comments and responses, and then this t= opic > went dark. This is in "The author will come back if he feels strongly enough, so I can safely forget about it. I am not qualified to take over as the prim= ary promoter of the topic if the author abandones it anyway" (aka "not mine= ") category. > From: Benjamin Kramer > Subject: [PATCH] Makefile: Use libc strlcpy on OSX > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:41:30 +0100 > Message-ID: <7f978c810901240741k201f954dx1c0470186094ae24@mail.gm= ail.com> > > My reading of the thread is that the only remaining issue was to = limit > the change to specific versions, and I think people who use OSX c= an help > polish this topic to completion. Likewise. > 4. From: Pete Wyckoff > Subject: [PATCH] git-p4: avoid syncing duplicate changes > Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:45:40 -0800 > Message-ID: <20090128164540.GA2137@padd.com> > > Nobody commented on this as far as I can tell. Do people not care > about p4? Simon Hausmann seem to be the most recent active contri= butor > and perhaps he can comment on this patch. Likewise. > 5. From: jidanni@jidanni.org > Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/git-show-branch.txt: compact -g > Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:14:02 +0800 > Message-Id: <1231211642-14463-1-git-send-email-jidanni@jidanni.or= g> > > I couldn't figure out what "compact -g" meant but other than that= I > think this patch is correct. Perhaps Junio has the author in his = mail > ignore list? I do not have anybody in my killfile. I think this patch is Ok with a minor fix to log as you say. How about git-show-branch doc: show -g as synonym to --reflog in the list > 6. From: Alexander Potashev > Subject: [PATCH] Replace deprecated dashed git commands in usage > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:39:27 +0300 > Message-ID: <1231094367-8831-1-git-send-email-aspotashev@gmail.co= m> > > This should have been in 1.6.0 already but it is still not. > Forgotten? I haven't looked at it. As long as it only touches the messages and no= t strings used to invoke other commands with their names, there shouldn't= be any downside. > 7. From: Dirk H=C3=B6rner > Subject: [PATCH] git-cvsimport: add support for cvs pserver passw= ord scrambling. > Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:06:40 +0200 > Message-ID: <5794AED2-43FF-4441-8292-0C9BFB3139A2@gmail.com> > > I think Johannes Schindelin commented but then nothing happened t= o > this patch. Is there any more work necessary for its inclusion? Again, this is in "not mine" category. > 8. From: Heikki Hokkanen > Subject: [PATCH] git show-ref: add --remotes option. > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:23:47 +0300 > Message-ID: <48F3A043.5070406@users.sf.net> > > I saw no comments but it is consistent with how git-rev-list allo= ws > you say branches and tags. Is there anything wrong with the patch= ? Hmm, ... goes to the archive ... I guess this shouldn't hurt. Thanks. I wish there were more like you.