From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git log -S doesn't find some commits
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:30:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vy6zzm02b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877i7jrp67.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> (Bernt Hansen's message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:29:04 -0500")
Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> ...
>> There seems to be a misconception on what -S<foo> does. It does *NOT*
>> grep for string <foo> in the patch text. It counts number of <foo> in
>> preimage and postimage and decides that the commit is worth showing iff
>> they differ.
>>
>> If you look at, for example (B):
>>
>> http://repo.or.cz/w/org-mode.git?a=commitdiff;h=837c81ce51
>>
>> You can see that in org-publish.el, org-publish-validate-link appears once
>> as removed and once as added, so the total number of the appearance of the
>> symbol in preimage and postimage are the same.
>
> Now I get it :)
>
> Thanks both of you!
By the way, I would not be opposed to a new feature, perhaps triggered
with -G<foo>, that acts as if it is grepping inside the patch text.
The reason behind -S<foo>'s behaviour is because it was designed as a part
ofa "incremetal digging" tool before the current "git-blame" that allows
to track even line-movements.
That is, you could write a tool to help the following interactively:
(1) get interested in a block of text in a recent version;
(2) feed that to 'git log' like this:
git log -1 -p -S"$potentially_multi_line_text" $rev
this will find an old rev R whose parent R^ did not have the lines
in the exact form you fed with -S.
(3) inspect the output, and decide what to do next:
(3-a) you may want to adjust the text you look for, taking into
account how the neighbouring lines used to look like in R^, and run
another "git log -S" starting at R^; and/or
(3-b) you may want to run "git grep" for the text in the entire
tree in R^, to see if this was a code refactoring that consolidates
multiple copies of the same thing into a single place.
and go back to step (2).
cf. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/27/focus=217
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-04 22:59 git log -S doesn't find some commits Bernt Hansen
2008-11-04 23:06 ` Pieter de Bie
2008-11-04 23:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-04 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-05 0:29 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-11-05 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-11-05 0:25 ` Bernt Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vy6zzm02b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=bernt@norang.ca \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox