From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: core.autocrlf and merge conflict output Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:45:35 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy74xj7ww.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Edward Z. Yang" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 23 02:46:42 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KAaCe-000149-Dz for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:46:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752174AbYFWApo (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:45:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752123AbYFWApo (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:45:44 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:60401 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752037AbYFWApo (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:45:44 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435951F26E; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:45:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67A141F26C; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:45:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Edward Z. Yang's message of "Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:08:59 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B4859576-40BD-11DD-8BD7-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Edward Z. Yang" writes: > Apparently, the conflict information Git writes to the working copy > during merge doesn't respect core.autocrlf,... Is this an old news before 249c61a (merge-recursive: respect core.autocrlf when writing out the result, 2008-06-09) happened?