From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Provide git_config with a callback-data parameter Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:52:55 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy76cib9k.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vk5hwn0tp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 15 03:54:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JwSfT-0004c8-Vi for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 15 May 2008 03:54:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751780AbYEOBxG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 21:53:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751998AbYEOBxG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 21:53:06 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:57929 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751780AbYEOBxE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 21:53:04 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2065351A9; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:53:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E0A51A6; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:53:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 15 May 2008 02:02:45 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A78BCA08-2221-11DD-95C1-80001473D85F-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Great, as this has also been a pet-peeve of mine for quite some time. >> >> Except the patch has quite a many rejects X-<. > > Did you try to apply it to "next"? The rejects are Ok. As long as function signature change of git_config() is there, any misconversion will be caught by the compiler so I can manage with relatively high confidence. I need manual inspection on the other patch, as s/path.list/string.list/ could oversubstitute without breaking compilation.