From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] diff options: Introduce --ignore-submodules Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:17:01 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy76cn1aq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vbq38oi3j.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 14 21:18:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JwMUD-00032K-75 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:18:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758600AbYENTRK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 15:17:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758312AbYENTRJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 15:17:09 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:45104 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751660AbYENTRI (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 15:17:08 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA235433D; Wed, 14 May 2008 15:17:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5669D4335; Wed, 14 May 2008 15:17:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 14 May 2008 19:42:55 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 57C338EE-21EA-11DD-94B5-80001473D85F-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > The point is: for the sake of a script (which wants to ignore > submodules) asking if there is a diff, I think it makes sense to not > ignore those changes. IOW I think my patch is enough for the purpose of > getting stash/rebase to behave. But the patch is not about stash/rebase but affects all diff users, doesn't it?