From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"Manoj Srivastava" <srivasta@ieee.org>,
"Ping Yin" <pkufranky@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Documentation status
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 21:27:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vy76pnzo9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805050548.58905.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (Christian Couder's message of "Mon, 5 May 2008 05:48:58 +0200")
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:
> Le samedi 3 mai 2008, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
>> Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:
>> > About man page sections, Perl is consistent because every thing is in
>> > section 1.
>>
>> I do not think it is a good example to follow, though.
>
> I agree.
>
>> > Now for git we already have git commands in section 1 and some
>> > other documentation (gitattributes, gitignore, gitmodules) in section 5
>> > and "git" in section 7. Do we want to keep "git" alone in section 7 and
>> > put tutorials in section 1 ? Or put everything in section 1 ?
>>
>> My preference is to move git(7) to git(1) because it is describing a
>> command at the end-user level (distros are much better than us to come up
>> with a way to deal with conflict resolution between us and the other
>> git), keep file format description in section 5 (that's where they belong
>> to).
>
> Ok, I will do that.
> Then what about tutorials (that I put in section 7) ?
Please step back a bit. What's the reason why you need to make everything
into manpages?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-05 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 3:30 [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: convert tutorials to man pages Christian Couder
2008-05-02 9:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-05-02 12:49 ` Jeff King
2008-05-02 14:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-03 4:04 ` Christian Couder
2008-05-03 17:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-05-05 3:48 ` Documentation status (was Re: [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: convert tutorials to man pages) Christian Couder
2008-05-05 4:27 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-05-05 7:34 ` Documentation status Jakub Narebski
2008-05-06 3:11 ` Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vy76pnzo9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=pkufranky@gmail.com \
--cc=srivasta@ieee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).