From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tidy up git mergetool's backup file behaviour and variable names
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:45:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vy79jsza1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9543203388d64839de78822efb538903fc15bf7f.1203251306.git.charles@hashpling.org
Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org> writes:
> Currently a backup pre-merge file with conflict markers is sometimes
> kept with a .orig extenstion and sometimes removed depending on the
> particular merge tool used.
>
> This patch makes the handling consistent across all merge tools and
> configurable via a new mergetool.keepBackup config variable
>
> Changed the merge file path variable to MERGED for consistency with the
> names of the merge temporary filename variables. This done with the
> intention of having these variables used by user scripts in a subsequent
> custom merge tool patch.
I would have preferred two separate patches, one s/path/MERGED/
and the other save/remove clean-up, which would be much easier
way to review, but this is what we have, so let's work on this
version.
> +mergetool.keepBackup::
> + After performing a merge, the original file with conflict markers
> + can be saved as a file with a `.orig` extension. If this variable
> + is set to `false` then this file is not preserved.
> +
s/$/ Defaults to true (i.e. keep the backup files)/.
We might also want a command line option to override the user's
usual default specified with this configuration but that can be
left for later rounds.
> @@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ resolve_deleted_merge () {
> }
>
> check_unchanged () {
> - if test "$path" -nt "$BACKUP" ; then
> + if test "$MERGED" -nt "$BACKUP" ; then
I think this is the cause of your automated test sometimes
needing 1 sec sleep. This check should perhaps be done with a
"! cmp $MERGED $BACKUP >/dev/null", which would succeed if the
user's interaction with the backend tool touched the file.
The rest of the patch looked fine to me.
We might also want to add -y (assume "Yes" answer to "Did you
resolve it" question without actually asking) command line
option to the script, but that would be for later rounds.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-18 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-17 12:45 [PATCH 1/2] Tidy up git mergetool's backup file behaviour and variable names Charles Bailey
2008-02-17 12:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] Teach git mergetool to use custom commands defined at config time Charles Bailey
2008-02-18 3:45 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-02-18 8:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] Tidy up git mergetool's backup file behaviour and variable names Charles Bailey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vy79jsza1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=charles@hashpling.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).