From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up documentation that references deprecated 'git peek-remote'. Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:11:55 -0800 Message-ID: <7vy7bs50ac.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1197882503-4296-1-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 18 01:12:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J4Q4U-0003QA-Fp for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:12:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933793AbXLRAMG (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:12:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933535AbXLRAMF (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:12:05 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:32903 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933776AbXLRAME (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:12:04 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2228D49EF; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:12:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B095249EE; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:11:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1197882503-4296-1-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:08:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > Now that 'git peek-remote' is deprecated and only an alias for > 'git ls-remote', it should not be referenced from other manual pages. > > This also removes the description of the --exec option, which is no > longer present. It seems to be supported as a backward compatibility option but not shown in the short help. Removal of it from the documentation is alright nevertheless. Thanks.