From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-svnimport Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:30:16 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy7dpy8qf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <31e679430710250225w39a876d0w738d819245e514e@mail.gmail.com> <20071026145520.2141.qmail@7a6a65599aed61.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <47222CB3.9070100@midwinter.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Gerrit Pape , git@vger.kernel.org To: Steven Grimm X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 26 21:30:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IlUtC-0001FB-Fj for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:30:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752650AbXJZTa0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:30:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752251AbXJZTa0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:30:26 -0400 Received: from rune.pobox.com ([208.210.124.79]:51089 "EHLO rune.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751453AbXJZTaZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:30:25 -0400 Received: from rune (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rune.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABE315083F; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:30:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CED14DDD3; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:30:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <47222CB3.9070100@midwinter.com> (Steven Grimm's message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:06:43 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Steven Grimm writes: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: >>> I'm not sure these are worth fixing, I'd rather suggest to drop >>> git-svnimport in favor of git-svn, and not installing it in future >>> versions. >>> >> I already proposed this. The outcome was... silent. >> > > Me too, and same reaction. > > So I vote we interpret that as, "No objections from anyone." Likewise.